Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 65

Thread: Allow 850 twins into Supertwins GTU

  1. #1
    Senior Member Expert
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Littleton, Co
    Posts
    1,659

    Allow 850 twins into Supertwins GTU

    Quote Originally Posted by rybo
    Current rule: 2.4.1.3


    3. SuperTwins GTU
    - Up to 750 cc two cylinder, four stroke, four valve, water cooled
    - Up to 250cc two stroke, two cylinder, water cooled
    - Unlimited displacement, two cylinder, four stroke, two valves per cylinder, air cooled
    - Unlimited displacement single cylinder, four stroke


    Proposed Revision:

    3. SuperTwins GTU
    - Up to 850 cc two cylinder, four stroke, four valve, water cooled
    - Up to 250cc two stroke, two cylinder, water cooled
    - Unlimited displacement, two cylinder, four stroke, two valves per cylinder, air cooled
    - Unlimited displacement single cylinder, four stroke


    As SuperTwins is a modern bike class, not a vintage class I make the proposal with the following in mind.

    1) There is only one bike in current production that is eligible for this class, the Kawasaki EX650.

    2) The Ducati 848 is eligible in EVERY other middleweight class

    3) GTU denotes this class as a middleweight, not a lightweight class.

    The Ducati 749 is no longer produced (750cc twin)
    The SV650 is no longer produced (650cc twin)

    These were the dominant bikes in this class in years past.
    Casey D

  2. #2
    Senior Member Expert
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Littleton, Co
    Posts
    1,659
    Quote Originally Posted by Bartman
    Scotty just because there are no 2010 sv650s does not mean it is not current, there were no 2010 Suzuki but there will still be a SV when production resumes and lets not forget the EX650 not to mention all the chinese knockoffs of the SVs that could run in STGTU.
    Bumping the twins to 850 just for the Duck makes no sense for me, if Suke and Kawaki make a larger cc twin OK but we are talking about making what would in essence be a 848 class which would be OK to do a 848 spec class if you want.
    Casey D

  3. #3
    Senior Member Expert
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Littleton, Co
    Posts
    1,659
    Quote Originally Posted by Hotrod
    I am with ^ Bart ^

    Opening it up to the Duck 848 would render pretty much everything else in the class obsolete... 369 lbs, 134 hp and 70lb-ft torque???

    That thing will lay waste to 600's, and those decimate all comers on the sv... (unless Shannon is around)
    Casey D

  4. #4
    Senior Member Amateur
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Posts
    419
    Ha! You moved it while I was replying... Whoops. Thanks Casey!
    I did not claw my way to the top of the foodchain to eat my veggies.

    glenngsxr wrote:
    trannies are way different... Glenn #62

    MRA #822

  5. #5
    Senior Member Expert
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Littleton, Co
    Posts
    1,659
    Quote Originally Posted by Hotrod
    Ha! You moved it while I was replying... Whoops. Thanks Casey!
    Now just if I was that fast on a bike...

    Casey D

  6. #6
    Senior Member Expert
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Parker
    Posts
    527
    As I am watching this one with interest... when do changes get approved or denied for 2011 race season?
    Boulder Motor Sports - RhinoMoto - American Express

  7. #7
    Senior Member Expert
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Posts
    737

    Re: Allow 850 twins into Supertwins GTU

    [quote="dragos13"]
    Quote Originally Posted by rybo
    The Ducati 749 is no longer produced (750cc twin)
    The SV650 is no longer produced (650cc twin)

    These were the dominant bikes in this class in years past.
    The SV650 is still the reason there is a Twins GTU class, and they still dominate. Why throw a fox in the hen house?

  8. #8
    Senior Member Expert
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Littleton, Co
    Posts
    1,659
    Quote Originally Posted by Munch
    As I am watching this one with interest... when do changes get approved or denied for 2011 race season?
    Around the end of November.
    Casey D

  9. #9
    Senior Member Expert
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    seventh circle of board hell
    Posts
    1,100
    Yet once again I have shown my lack of computer skills by not knowing how to move a tread.
    Might be time for this old dog to get some training. :lol:

  10. #10
    Senior Member Expert
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Posts
    2,416
    Quote Originally Posted by Bartman
    Yet once again I have shown my lack of computer skills by not knowing how to move a tread.
    Might be time for this old dog to get some training. :lol:
    Bart,

    you probably move more tread than anyone else here, except maybe Mark E Mark....
    MRA Expert #69
    Sponsored by: Chicane Instruction
    STM Suspension, Speedin' Motorsports
    Northern Colorado Euro Motorcycles
    Boulder Motorsports, Sol Performance Pirelli
    Angry Marmot Motorsports
    Sarah, Aaron and David

  11. #11
    Senior Member Expert
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    seventh circle of board hell
    Posts
    1,100
    Ok so I can't spell either, I think I will just crack another beer that will help.

  12. #12
    Senior Member Expert
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Parker, CO
    Posts
    575
    Bart get back to work and quit drinkin on the clock!

  13. #13
    Senior Member Expert
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Denver
    Posts
    1,534
    Quote Originally Posted by dragos13
    Quote Originally Posted by Munch
    As I am watching this one with interest... when do changes get approved or denied for 2011 race season?
    Around the end of November.

    Casey are we shooting for October 17th for the rules change meeting? I don't know when that gets firmed up. @Munch that's open to everyone to attend and give input.
    #145 Wyeth Jackson
    Wyeth Homes Real Estate www.WyethHomes.com
    G-Force Powersports, Pirelli & Sol Performance, CT Racing, Kawasaki, Bell Helmets, TCX Boots, Vortex, Racers Edge, Un!nk Printworks, Motul, Vortex, Rising Sun Cycles, CHR, Attack Performance, NinjaTech

  14. #14
    Jim 'smooth' Brewer
    Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by oldtimer
    Casey are we shooting for October 17th for the rules change meeting? I don't know when that gets firmed up.
    Although I appreciate the enthusiasm, I think that's a little too soon. If you're going to follow the usual process (http://forums.mra-racing.org/viewtopic.php?t=9464 for example) then I'd actually say mid-November would be a better time. Last year notwithstanding, I found that giving more time for proposals and discussion after the season was over tended to get more people involved and more ideas brought forward.

  15. #15
    Senior Member Expert
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Littleton, Co
    Posts
    1,659
    I'll be talking to Johnny B tonight to figure out a date. It should be sometime around the end of October. This will give enough time to present the suggestions to the Board at the November meeting. Then, everything should be finalized and a summary will be posted around mid to end of November.
    Casey D

  16. #16
    Senior Member Amateur
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Castle Rock, CO
    Posts
    304
    Just a note on this from a guy with no dog in the fight, the sv650 has been replaced by the Gladius, which appears to use enough different parts that it would not be easy to race prep with sv stuff. That said the class killer now is a 749r which is damn close to an 848 in power and weight and far better set up chassis wise. Since Ducati is pretty much the only company making a middleweight twin now it seems only a matter of time for us to let it in.
    #91 Triumph 675
    Thanks to: Motowheels, Woodcraft, Cogent Dynamics, Toyota, and Nikkie

  17. #17
    Senior Member Expert
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Denver
    Posts
    4,077
    I love how we have the same argument for literally 10 years.

    Viva la 749R!!

    :roll:
    dave@MotoSix DOT com | MRA #31, WERA #311

  18. #18
    Senior Member Expert
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Posts
    2,416
    Quote Originally Posted by dave.gallant
    I love how we have the same argument for literally 10 years.

    Viva la 749R!!

    :roll:
    come on Dave, it wouldn't be an official rule change meeting without this debate.
    MRA Expert #69
    Sponsored by: Chicane Instruction
    STM Suspension, Speedin' Motorsports
    Northern Colorado Euro Motorcycles
    Boulder Motorsports, Sol Performance Pirelli
    Angry Marmot Motorsports
    Sarah, Aaron and David

  19. #19
    Senior Member Expert
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    seventh circle of board hell
    Posts
    1,100
    There is one very big difference now Dave, you can make a SV into a 750 but as far as I know you can't get them up to 850 and lets face it in no way could you call a 848 middleweight. If we do this we will need to do what we have talked about for 10 years is make a light middle and heavy twins class, main problem I see is number of bikes just is not there to justify it.
    Hell in light of Glenns suggestion in the need to maybe trim a few classes lets get rid of these pesky twins and we will all go 250 ninja racing oh wait those are twins to. CRAP :lol:

  20. #20
    Senior Member Expert
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Denver
    Posts
    4,077
    I love arguing with Ben, but honestly I think we all have hashed this issue to death over the years. Maybe it is time to simply combine everything under GTO and then spec class the little bikes for the less money intensive fun?
    dave@MotoSix DOT com | MRA #31, WERA #311

  21. #21
    Senior Member Expert
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Posts
    737
    Quote Originally Posted by rybo
    come on Dave, it wouldn't be an official rule change meeting without this debate.
    Especially since rain tires got voted into super sport classes last year.

  22. #22
    Senior Member Expert
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Denver
    Posts
    4,077
    Just wait until the full WSB traction control units show up on the Supersport grid next season.

    Maybe there will be racing worth watching again in the Ninja cup class.
    dave@MotoSix DOT com | MRA #31, WERA #311

  23. #23
    Senior Member Amateur
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Posts
    419
    Quote Originally Posted by dave.gallant
    I love arguing with Ben, but honestly I think we all have hashed this issue to death over the years. Maybe it is time to simply combine everything under GTO and then spec class the little bikes for the less money intensive fun?
    I will pitch a wall-eyed hissy-fit with a full blown case of the screamin' heebie-jeebies thrown in for good measure if we do away with the sv classes. :evil:

    And trust you me, that won't be a pretty sight!
    I did not claw my way to the top of the foodchain to eat my veggies.

    glenngsxr wrote:
    trannies are way different... Glenn #62

    MRA #822

  24. #24
    Senior Member Expert
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Denver
    Posts
    4,077
    Quote Originally Posted by Hotrod
    Quote Originally Posted by dave.gallant
    I love arguing with Ben, but honestly I think we all have hashed this issue to death over the years. Maybe it is time to simply combine everything under GTO and then spec class the little bikes for the less money intensive fun?
    I will pitch a wall-eyed hissy-fit with a full blown case of the screamin' heebie-jeebies thrown in for good measure if we do away with the sv classes. :evil:

    And trust you me, that won't be a pretty sight!
    Allowing the 749R did just that. You can race the SV in almost anything and call it an "SV Class". It will be just as competitive against a 110HP R6 as a 125HP Ducati whatever-it-is (air cooled 1000cc or 4 valve 749 new gen desmo).

    But, I am not here to argue that point really. I rather argue with Sexy Ben about it anyways cause he is cute when he is mad.

    (Did I mention I absolutely love Ducati's of almost every generation? I love SVs too....I am an equal opportunity hater on this topic. )
    dave@MotoSix DOT com | MRA #31, WERA #311

  25. #25
    Resident T-Bagger Expert T Baggins's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Somewhere between here and Elizabeth
    Posts
    5,164
    this is why we made LWGP basically an SV / EX class. get rid of the exotics (TZ, 749, etc...) and make it about racing again...

    Anybody ever wonder...

    If Ducati made a bike with "normal displacement" like everyone else - would it still be the class of the field?

    Surely I'm not the only one to catch on to their "build a cheater bike (via displacement advantage) and put pressure on the racing organizations to allow it into classes we know it will dominate" technique employed by the bolognianians.

    crafty little bastards they are... :lol:
    Tony Baker #21

    Sponsored by:
    Vickery Motorsports, Short Bus Race Team, 406 Racing Michelin, Vortex, PitBull, Driven, Third Bridge Wines, Imodium A-D

Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Fay Myers 2 Wheel Tuesday Tonight @ Twins Peaks
    By JimWilson29 in forum General Discussion
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: June 25th, 2013, 12:00 PM
  2. 2008 SV650 - Great Supertwins GTU bike
    By mra128 in forum Bikes For Sale
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: April 17th, 2012, 10:14 AM
  3. Twins class restructuring - submitted by Chris Dale
    By Jim 'smooth' Brewer in forum Rules & Tech
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: December 15th, 2009, 06:00 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •